VBScript and SendKeys).Solid Automator 2.4838 Multilingual Categories: Software » Windows Solid Automator - automated PDF to Word conversion, PDF/A validation, PDF to PDF/A conversion, searchable PDF creation and text extraction.I believe barhar was being facetious with his comment. It uses a combination of simulated keystrokes, mouse movement and window/control manipulation in order to automate tasks in a way not possible or reliable with other languages (e.g. AutoIt v3 is a freeware BASIC-like scripting language designed for automating the Windows GUI and general scripting.
Automator Equivalent Mac OS X
If that doesn't suit you, our users have ranked more than 50 alternatives to Automator and many of them are available for Windows so hopefully you can find a suitable replacement.Not to mention in Mac OS X, you can combine those scripting languages to achieve things that the Windows batch file could only dream of - imagine a php program that parses text, then passes that text on to a Perl program for severe and powerful regex processing. The best Windows alternative is AutoHotkey, which is both free and Open Source. That means that if someone is versed in scripting, the tool they would want to use is already included in Mac OS X - no need to go searching or installing anything.Automator is not available for Windows but there are plenty of alternatives that runs on Windows with similar functionality. Some people know Ruby inside and out - others, like myself, would opt for Perl or php. Barhar's point was that, yes, one script would do the job - but you have a bunch of options in choosing which scripting language to use to do that job for you.
For novices, there are programs that allow you to schedule tasks with a simple GUI.Was your point that Windows is much simpler? Or more powerful? Or "less bloated" (which it is not)? Maybe I'm missing the point of your post.Click to expand.I guess this is all personal preference - in Mac OS X, as I stated, those languages take up very little space. For those that are experienced with UNIX-style scheduling, it's a no-brainer to set up a script to run every hour or whatever. The funny thing is that Windows has a tray shortcut for this.Also bear in mind that each of those scripting/programming languages is very small - hardly considered "bloat."There are also several, small, freely-available programs that will help a novice set up a scheduled task using Mac OS X's built-in scheduler (either cron or launchd). In addition, a lot of those languages are good for web-based scripting, while others are great for local, command-line scripting.I dont want to use Automator to do this unless I can do it without popping up a bunch of windows.
But now we're getting into backward-compatibility issues.I dunno. Windows, on the other hand, is a much more GUI-oriented operating system, with a "shell" that is decades old. While not included in all distributions, they are key languages in doing useful things in the command-line. NET framework are quite large - Visual Studio being several gigabytes for the complete package (C#, C++, VB, etc.).Part of the reason that Mac OS X includes these technologies is that they are almost inherent to a UNIX distribution. The reason is probably because they're command-line based and have no need to include a GUI, which is a very large portion of the size of an IDE.Still, it's worth comparing that Visual Studio and the.
0 kommentar(er)
